Perhaps I could restate this question more simply. If the asset pipeline is in digest mode (in production), is it expected behavior that it should also serve assets _without_ digests in their filenames?
-GR On Sep 5, 2011, at 2:34 PM, gr2020 wrote: > Hello...I've run into some behavior I didn't expect with the asset > pipeline, running rails 3.1.0 (released version). > > In my environments/production.rb I have: > > config.assets.compile = false > config.assets.digest = true > > When I precompile my assets, all seems to work fine; it generates > assets with digests in their name, and I can retrieve them with > something like > > /assets/tvlogo1-0ac8bb18dbc4d72f65d626985535fd22.png > > When I retrieve the above, it's served from apache. > > Somewhat unexpectedly, I can also successfully retrieve: > > /assets/tvlogo1.png > > There is no such file in the public/assets directory, but it > successfully retrieves the file and serves it through rack/rails (I > can see the request in the production.log file). > > Is this expected behavior? > > It's convenient, in that I can use my application.css from, say, > static HTML files like my 404.html and 500.html pages, but I didn't > expect it to work given that I have config.assets.compile=false. > > Thanks, > > Greg > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
