@aldo: I also use the default capistrano recipe, so that can't be the
actual problem.  Can I ask why you include the sprockets gem through
source in your Gem file? sprockets should already be loaded through
rails, or is there a bugfix in the sprockets head that causes this
problem?

Yes there was a bug in the sprockets head so I should include gem through
source as recommended in Rails issues list in github.

-- Aldo Nievas
SATIO Internet Solutions
www.satio.com.ar
[email protected]
M: 54 11 3487 4900



On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Michael Rigart <[email protected]>wrote:

> @jim: precompiling them locally seems indeed the best way at the moment.
> But I'm still curious what the reason is that precompiling on server
> takes that long. I'm setting up a test so I can investigate it a bit
> further. But thanks for the tip, it's a nice workaround.
>
> @aldo: I also use the default capistrano recipe, so that can't be the
> actual problem.  Can I ask why you include the sprockets gem through
> source in your Gem file? sprockets should already be loaded through
> rails, or is there a bugfix in the sprockets head that causes this
> problem?
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to