> +1, but doesn't 3.1 require 1.9.2 or better? I could swear that's a > given.
Is Rails 3.1 only available on 1.9.2? I was going by this: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html which says it only requires 1.8.7 or higher, but to avoid a couple 1.8.7 versions because they don't work. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
