On Oct 28, 3:38 pm, AWD Switzerland <[email protected]> wrote: > Frederick Cheung wrote in post #1028961: > > > In theory I don't think this is needed because different threads > > should be using different connection objects (there's supposed to be a > > pool of connection objections, and any member of the pool is only ever > > used by one thread at a time. You might also want to ask on the rails- > > core list > > Seems practice disagrees with that theory. At least we had exceptions > due to unsynchronized cache access. And we ourselves did not introduce > any threads in the code. > I'll see whether I get answers here. If not, I'll gladly accept your > advice and take it on to rails-core. > It might also be related to https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/1670
Fred > Best regards > Stefan > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
