On 7 November 2011 19:32, Dave Aronson <[email protected]> wrote: > So, aside from declaring one more class, there's no reason not to use > hmt from the start.
Ok, that's good, if I need or not to attach information to the relationship I can always use has_many :through. Can you suggest a name for the :through model between Company and LegalRepresentative? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
