no. imagine u go from the top, and the deeper u traverse into the tree, the more details u get. its secondary if the tree reflects ingredients, recipes, or a dish. as soon something is made up of something else, your best bet is a tree. but, as usual, doing by learning good luck
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Norbert Melzer <[email protected]>wrote: > 2011/11/14 tom <[email protected]>: > > > ingredient: > > -id > > -parent_id > > -name > > -uom (=unit of measure) > > -qty (=quantity) > > With this approach I could use water and flour only to produce Dough. > > But I want to use the water in another recipe to brew a beer and there > fore I need other qantities. So I think the approach of Frederick > seems to fit my needs more > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
