On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 04:12, Colin Law <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 27 November 2011 22:34, Dave Aronson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> ruby-1.9.3-head :005 > u1 = User.new >> => #<User id: nil, other details snipped> >> ruby-1.9.3-head :006 > u1.id = 1001 >> => 1001 >> ruby-1.9.3-head :007 > u2 = User.new >> => #<User id: nil, other details snipped> >> ruby-1.9.3-head :008 > u2.id = 1002 >> => 1002 > > It is not appropriate to set the id values manually. Save them > instead, then rails will allocate the ids. Since it was just for the purpose of a little irb experiment, I didn't want to go to the bother of setting up a new app or jumping through the hoops to set the other fields needed to make the record saveable. > Try again with letting rails manage the ids and you may get a different > result. Essentially my advice to the OP! :-) Let's see what he says. -Dave -- LOOKING FOR WORK! What: Ruby (on/off Rails), Python, other modern languages. Where: Northern Virginia, Washington DC (near Orange Line), and remote work. See: davearonson.com (main) * codosaur.us (code) * dare2xl.com (excellence). Specialization is for insects. (Heinlein) - Have Pun, Will Babble! (Aronson) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
