On 3 December 2011 17:20, Phil Dobbin <phildob...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/12/11 11:16, "Colin Law" <clan...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Just one point to add to the other suggestions that you use rvm and >> gemsets, which is not to use 2.3.5 but the latest 2.3.x (if you really >> need to use 2.3 at all). I believe there have been security fixes >> that you should have. >> >> Out of interest, why do you need to use 2.3 for a new project? > > Hi, Colin. > > The server I'll be deploying on, so I'm reliably informed, is geared up to > v.2.3.5 of rails so that's what I've been asked to use. > > I'll check about later releases of 2.3.x. Thanks for your help,
In addition I would seriously question the use of 2.3 versus 3.1. 2.3 is only receiving security fixes now I believe (not bug fixes) and it is not trivial to update an app from 2.3 to 3. If the app is expected to have a significant life then using 2.3 just because the server is currently geared up for that is surely a questionable decision. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
