Michael Pavling wrote in post #1036557: > On 13 December 2011 17:31, DK <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Windows" is not necessarily "IIS" - it's perfectly possible to deploy > on Windows (with Apache, Passenger, etc). Deploying with IIS as per > the OP... that's likely to be much harder.
I am aware that you can install Apache on Windows and that may be an option if I can persuade (using appropriate supportable arguments) someone to approve it. Looking at some of the comments I Have come across on other forums, they seem to concur with your last statement that setting up on IIS is (or at least was at the time) rather complex. However, I am bound by corporate policy to at least explore the possibility of using the native web server using other options only as a last resort (i.e. where this can be proven not to be possible or practical). -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
