Tim Shaffer wrote in post #1038731: > I apologize... I guess I wasn't sure what you were asking.
No problem! > ActionController::Base doesn't have *any* methods included. You're right -- I mis-spoke: s/"ActionController::Base"/"standard Rails distribution"/g In addition to the resourceful routes, you'd need extensions to the various generators and templates, but yep, that's what I'm arguing for. > I can definitely see your case for wanting to do this. Upon reflection, the right thing to do would be to open a lighthouse ticket and let the pros decide. Wish me luck! :) - ff -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
