On 8/21/2012 12:12 PM, Michael Monnerie wrote:
I had this rule in a HAM:
3.7 FROM_12LTRDOM From a 12-letter domain
which caused it to be identified as SPAM. Who ever wrote that rule?
There may have been a spammer who used 12 letter domains, but causing
EVERY 12 letter domain to be identified by 3.7 points is... too much.
Maybe the mass-check script "learned" that this rule should have 3.7, or
who decided to have 3.7? If it was mass-check, there should be a way to
limit points for a rule to a realistic range by human. For example, to
define that FROM_12LTRDOM could have from 0.1 to 1.5 points, so we don't
cause nearly every 12 letter domain mail to be spam.
I hope this is the right list to ask this?
Current score on this rule is 0.098. Have you updated your rules recently?
--
Bowie
