On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Axb wrote:
> Still not good:
[...]
> 15 sec - still way too long
> can anybody reproduce?
Yup. I aborted after a few minutes because it appeared too slow, but
did not post because you had already volunteered.
Here's the histogram of scan times so far:
mas@falun:~$ cat ~sacheck/masscheckwork/weekly_mass_check/masses/*.log | perl
-ne '/scantime=([0-9]+),/ && $h[$1]++; END{foreach $i (1..20) {printf "%2d:
%d\n", $i, $h[$i]}}'
1: 0
2: 0
3: 0
4: 0
5: 0
6: 0
7: 0
8: 0
9: 0
10: 0
11: 1
12: 5
13: 9
14: 20
15: 24
16: 8
17: 1
18: 1
19: 1
20: 0
Regards
Marc
