On 03/09/2013 02:55 PM, Marc Andre Selig wrote:
Hi all,
here are some DNS related error messages reported by auto-mass-check in
--net mode that should probably be caught?
(domain=0u_e3czdty8udzyvx98_ox97tdy97utd3aut09ultcdaumtd3unqnrrntw3utwv8utweut80u.jp.dob.sibl.suppor
t-intelligence.net. type=A class=IN) failed: a label in a domain name is longer
than 63 bytes
dns: new_dns_packet
(domain=0u_e3czdty8udzyvx98_ox97tdy97utd3aut09ultcdaumtd3unqnrrntw3utwv8utweut80u.jp.dbl.spamhaus.or
g. type=A class=IN) failed: a label in a domain name is longer than 63 bytes
dns: new_dns_packet
(domain=0u_e3czdty8udzyvx98_ox97tdy97utd3aut09ultcdaumtd3unqnrrntw3utwv8utweut80u.jp.
type=A
class=IN) failed: a label in a domain name is longer than 63 bytes
try with dig & you'll get
dig A
0u_e3czdty8udzyvx98_ox97tdy97utd3aut09ultcdaumtd3unqnrrntw3utwv8utweut80u.jp
+short
dig:
'0u_e3czdty8udzyvx98_ox97tdy97utd3aut09ultcdaumtd3unqnrrntw3utwv8utweut80u.jp'
is not a legal name (label too long)
iirc, max label size is 63 chars. so this is hardly SA but a DNS "feature"
dns: new_dns_packet (domain=podify-merchants..com. type=A class=IN) failed: a
domain name contains a
null label
I see these often but haven't been able to reproduce the two periods
before the tld. I'm sure someone here will be able to explain this in
detail.
For future reference, would you prefer me to report things like this
directly using Bugzilla, or is it ok to post here?
Here is fine so others can check before we open bugs which aren't.
