08.04.2013 17:16, Kevin Golding kirjoitti: > Logically that's the wrong way - the original guide was always "after 9am > UTC" and mine run about 30 minutes after that. Which in summer time (i.e. > now) I run at 10:30am local time but still 9:30 UTC. If I moved an hour > forward I'd be 9:30 local and 8:30 UTC so before that slot. I can try moving > an hour back if anyone wants me to but during winter that will put me an > extra hour behind I suspect. > > Kevin
I'm running at 14.00-16.00 EET which is 0-2pm UTC I guess. No problems. > On 8 Apr 2013, at 13:42, Axb wrote: > >> On 04/08/2013 02:18 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >>> On 4/5/2013 10:08 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >>>> 05.04.2013 16:19, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti: >>>>> On 4/5/2013 5:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2013-03-30. >>>>>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2013-04-04. >>>>>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2013-04-04. >>>>>> >>>>>> 20130404: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000: >>>>>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20130404 >>>>>> 20130404: Spam: 22548, Ham: 179579 >>>>> My guess is some things are wonky over Easter Week for some of the >>>>> masscheckers and will revisit this soon. >>>> I don't see some of the masscheckers in ruleqa results, including >>>> myself. The job runs as normal, no problem seen with it. >>>> >>> I don't use the ruleqa page so I am relying on the masscheck logs. For >>> example, last night your logs were usable. >>> >>> Anyone who is sending logs that doesn't see their's meeting the >>> requirements? >> could this have something to do with the daylight saving time changes in >> some places (eg: Eurozone) >> >> I pushed my masscheck slot an hour forward, just in case, but still don't >> meet requirements - go figure. >> -- Do what comes naturally. Seethe and fume and throw a tantrum.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
