29.07.2013 17:43, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti: > On 7/29/2013 5:15 AM, Kevin Golding wrote: >> On 29 Jul 2013, at 02:08, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> >>> Thanks Kevin. Try Darxus' recommendation and let's see what >>> happens. We are actually publishing rules despite the odd reports. >>> >> I'm happy to but all he says is "a more appropriate time" - I just >> want to know when people think the more appropriate time is? I'll >> happily set it to run at virtually any time of the day, but I don't >> know when that appropriate time would be since I was running at the >> recommended time, and then I moved to accommodate one bug, and now >> that's not great too apparently. >> >> Are we saying another hour delay? I'll set to run at 11:42UTC today >> and we'll see, if anyone wants to suggest another time please say as >> otherwise I'll probably just be cycling through randomly whenever >> someone says it's wrong. > How about minus one hour and let's try that first ;-) I sadly know > very little about when things fire but it's based on the servers and > when they finish certain jobs which is more magic than science these > days. > > regards, > KAM > Seems to be OK now.
-- jarif.bit
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
