Makes sense to remove dev@ but no offense, can't they just check dns? Not making much headway with a replacement box yet for zones. Regards, KAM
Axb <[email protected]> wrote: >On 04/22/2014 11:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since >2014-04-19. >> SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since >2014-04-19. >> SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since >2014-04-19. >> >> 20140421: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000: >http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20140421 >> 20140421: Spam: 46551, Ham: 145401 >> >> >> The spam and ham counts on which this script alerts are from >> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20140421 >> Click "(source details)" (it's tiny and low contrast). >> It's from the second and third columns of the line that ends with >> "(all messages)" >> >> The source to this script is >> http://www.chaosreigns.com/sa/update-version-mon.pl >> > > >could we have these alerts on a little mailing list and be able to >opt-out? > >don't think it's so cool to tell spammers & the world (dev@) that we're > >no publishing rules
