On 30.10.2014 19:37, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> On 30.10.2014 18:27, Axb wrote:
>> On 10/30/2014 05:14 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>> On 30.10.2014 17:00, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>>> On 30.10.2014 11:44, Axb wrote:
>>>>> Jari,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you pls check these hits... are they really ham?
>>>>> (/home/jarif/Maildir/.Confirmed-HAM/)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20141029-r1635070-n/T_AXB_XSA_PXYEX?mclog=ham-jarif
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>> Yes. Technically they are ham, no matter that I lost money to the
>>>> sender
>>>> (scammer) of 4 of those emails. But ham.
>>>>
>>>> br. jarif
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I can also send these specimens unaltered to You, if it helps anything.
>> that would be cool... zip'em up... need to understand how that pattern
>> shows up in real ham...
>>
>> Thx
>> Alex
>>
> Here.
>
> Please do not kill me ;)
>
Huh. Damage.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to