Ok, after eagle project today I have a fairly large buffer of time and this is 
a key goal of mine.
Regards,
KAM

On June 2, 2017 11:01:40 PM EDT, Dave Jones <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>On 06/02/2017 04:31 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> On 6/2/2017 4:14 PM, David Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>> wget http://bbmass.spamassassin.org/updates/1797164.tar.gz
>>>> wget http://bbmass.spamassassin.org/updates/1797164.tar.gz.sha1
>>>> wget http://bbmass.spamassassin.org/updates/1797164.tar.gz.asc
>>>>
>>>> sa-update -D -v --install=1797164.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> Everything looks good to me in the brand new 1797164.tar.gz.  I did
>a 
>>>> diff against the current production tgz (1786853.tar.gz) contents
>and 
>>>> all files are there.  I also did a diff against the old 
>>>> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassinlorg and after
>the 
>>>> manual sa-update and see just the expected differences in rules and
>
>>>> scores.
>>>>
>>>> If I can get a few "thumbs up" responses, I will resume the DNS 
>>>> updates to be ready for a couple more masscheckers contributing 
>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No one?
>>>
>>> I put that tar.gz on my main mail filters (8) and my honeypot 
>>> masscheck server and everything seems to be working fine with proper
>
>>> scoring.  Are we ready to start the DNS updates?
>> 
>> To be clear, I tested this as well though we've been discussing on
>the 
>> sysadmins@s.a.o mailing list!  Please give it a try.
>> 
>> 
>
>We have the minimum masscheck contributors so we didn't have to force 
>this one minutes ago.  We can still use more contributors if you are 
>working to get yours going again.
>
>1797329.tar.gz just put out on the mirrors but no DNS change yet until 
>we get some confirmation from others that the new rulesets are good to
>go.
>
>-- 
>David Jones

Reply via email to