On 06/20/2017 03:24 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote:
On 6/19/2017 8:56 AM, David Jones wrote:
Does 72_scores.cf look OK lately? I just downloaded the latest rules
set and an old one from March 15th and they look very similar with
similar number of lines. Just making sure I don't need to dig into
the automasscheck scripts on the new server to find a problem.
Yes, I am concerned that 72_scores.cf is too small.
Checking 1799061 with a 3.4 branch, I show 47 lines and 2867 bytes.
Comparing
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/tags/sa-update_3.4.2_20170315085034/rulesrc/scores/72_scores.cf
shows that it was 144 lines and 9810 bytes.
What versions are you checking? Maybe I'm not checking apples to apples.
I think you compare the right thing, theres a big difference between those
tags. So I am also curious which 72_scores.cf David is looking at (march
15th).
And its really strange why HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS has been scored 0
in the full net + bayes mode. Does the scoring process output debug
information when it disables a rule? Or is it some kind of rounding issue,
maybe trying to assign a score lower than 0.001?
I checked dependencies on the ASF SA-vm1 and only Digest::SHA1 was
missing so I don't think that is it. I also checked my work on SHA256
and it's not colliding nor have I committed it to a central repo.
Overall I do not have lint problems with the current version but my
biggest concern is again apples to apples. Perhaps I'm not checking
something correctly.
Regards,
KAM
I have manually reverted the 72_scores.cf back to mid March with the
current ruleset. This should fix the low scoring on many rules reported
on the users list and other mailing lists related to SA (i.e.
MailScanner). We will hold here for a little while until I can figure
out what is going on with the build scripts on the new server.
I manually tested this new ruleset on my production servers. They
installed and linted fine.
Dave
