On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 12:15:08PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 10:26:40AM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I noticed that at least a couple of rules are not correctly checked
> > during masscheck and they never hit.
> > In my corpus I have emails that matches at least FROMNAME_SPOOFED_EMAIL
> > (~pds/20_fns.cf) and GB_HASHBL_BTC (~gbechis/20_btc.cf) but I cannot
> > find any trace of those rules in my masses log files.
> > Both rules are using a plugin that is not enabled by default;
> > before I start digging into masses/*, anybody knows which plugins are
> > used during masscheckwork and why ?
>
> Default plugins are used, nothing strange there..
>
> Already posted before asking if people are interested in masschecking DCC,
> now that the reputation data is free too. But I guess it's no surprise that
> no one even responsed and I'm still the only one masschecking it..
>
> run_all_masschecks() {
> run_masscheck single-corpus --all \
> --pre 'loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC' \
Granted, I would not advice running DCC (or any network rules for that
matter) unless corpus is "reused". Which is also something that no one
seems to care about.
