Change what? Not use --net?
Obviously we can't do that, otherwise stuff like DKIM_VALID won't hit and things like that will affect many meta rules too. I've advocated that all mass checkers should make use of --reuse, that way no network lookups are even required and hits actually reflect what happened during the original mail handling. It's pretty much pointless to query blacklists weeks after the mail was received, it's not accurate. And also like mentioned you might get ratelimited and abuse the lists with unnecessary queries.. Cheers, Henrik On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 03:30:01PM +0200, Marcin Miros??aw wrote: > Hi, > others are rather quiet so maybe it can be changed? > > > W dniu 2021-01-17 o 17:32, Kevin A. McGrail pisze: > > Marcin, > > > > I don't think masscheck really affects what RBLs we include or the > > scores except when we are considering adding or removing them. > > > > I would be +1 for changing that behavior but defer to others to weigh in > > first. > > > > Regards, > > > > KAM > > > > On 1/17/2021 10:49 AM, Marcin Miros?aw wrote: > >> Hi! > >> I've run masscheck on my host with MTA, after weekly masscheck my host > >> is blocked by uribl for sometime. > >> I think that weekly masscheck has incorrect results due to ratelimit of > >> uribl and I receive more spam for sometime ;) > >> Does it make sense to run weekley masscheck with --net when it can't > >> return correct results? > >> > >> Marcin > >
