On 2023-05-21 at 07:02:39 UTC-0400 (Sun, 21 May 2023 13:02:39 +0200)
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]>
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
For the last years I have been contributing nightly masscheck data
from my personal MTA setup. This has resulted in a rather small
dataset compared to other contributors, but it seemed useful to me,
mainly because of the non-english ham corpus (I have no idea if that
is a valid assumption though).
THANK YOU!
One of the things that worries me most about SA is that we don't have a
robust and diverse community of masscheck contributors. I don't have
great ideas to fix that, but I am always grateful for the people who
have put in the effort for the community.
Since a few weeks I've moved to a new MTA setup, where I no longer
perform spam/virus scanning myself, but an upstream provider does
this, and all mail (including all spam and virus content) is delivered
with appropriate headers.
I have no problem spending some time on setting up a new masscheck job
that uses the new corpus and tune it to ignore the upstream filter
result headers etc, but I'd rather not invest time if you think that
such a feed is not beneficiary to the ruleqa process.
I'd be happy to hear your thoughts.
I think we need as large and as diverse a collection of masscheck
contributors as we can get. I am reluctant to ask you to add work to
what I presume is a project to reduce your email efforts, but I hope you
will continue to submit your results.
--
Bill Cole
[email protected] or [email protected]
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
