See the message below. Also related errors reported to both the sysadmins and 
ruleqa lists for over a week.

At first I thought this was entirely secondary to the DDoS aimed at sa-vm. I 
did a couple rounds of mass blocking of network ranges doing bad things, but it 
seems that there is likely also just a lack of masscheck logs coming in.

Anyone have ideas for how to fix this?


Forwarded message:

> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: checkMasscheckContribs.sh on sa-vm.apache.org - not enough 
> contributors for SVN  1931846
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:17:02 +0000 (UTC)
>
> Corpus total: 82, Old: 8, Recent: 38, New: 18
>
> SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check:  1931846
>
> New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
>    SVN rev (Match) File Name (Date)
>    1931846 (Yes) - spam-mmiroslaw-mails-ham.r1931846.log (Feb 13 13:21)
>    1931846 (Yes) - spam-jhardin.r1931846.log (Feb 13 10:53)
>    1931824  (No) - ham-llanga.r1931824.log (Feb 12 17:26)
>    1931846 (Yes) - ham-mmiroslaw-mails-ham.r1931846.log (Feb 13 13:21)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-llanga.r1931801.log (Feb 11 17:21)
>    1931824  (No) - ham-mmiroslaw-mails-ham.r1931824.log (Feb 12 13:21)
>    1931846 (Yes) - spam-giovanni-ham.r1931846.log (Feb 13 11:48)
>    1931824  (No) - spam-giovanni-spam.r1931824.log (Feb 12 11:44)
>    1931824  (No) - ham-giovanni-ham.r1931824.log (Feb 12 11:44)
>    1931846 (Yes) - ham-whyscream.r1931846.log (Feb 13 09:09)
>    1931846 (Yes) - ham-spamsponge.r1931846.log (Feb 13 09:00)
>    1931846 (Yes) - spam-whyscream.r1931846.log (Feb 13 09:09)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-llanga.r1931801.log (Feb 11 17:21)
>    1931846 (Yes) - ham-giovanni-ham.r1931846.log (Feb 13 11:48)
>    1931846 (Yes) - ham-grenier.r1931846.log (Feb 13 09:00)
>    1931846 (Yes) - spam-spamsponge.r1931846.log (Feb 13 09:00)
>    1931824  (No) - spam-spamsponge.r1931824.log (Feb 12 09:00)
>    1931824  (No) - spam-llanga.r1931824.log (Feb 12 17:26)
>    1931846 (Yes) - spam-mmiroslaw-mails-spam.r1931846.log (Feb 13 13:21)
>    1931824  (No) - spam-mmiroslaw-mails-spam.r1931824.log (Feb 12 13:21)
>    1931846 (Yes) - spam-giovanni-spam.r1931846.log (Feb 13 11:48)
>    1931824  (No) - ham-spamsponge.r1931824.log (Feb 12 09:00)
>    1931846 (Yes) - ham-mmiroslaw-mails-spam.r1931846.log (Feb 13 13:21)
>    1931824  (No) - ham-grenier.r1931824.log (Feb 12 09:00)
>    1931824  (No) - ham-giovanni-spam.r1931824.log (Feb 12 11:44)
>    1931824  (No) - ham-jhardin.r1931824.log (Feb 12 10:53)
>    1931824  (No) - ham-mmiroslaw-mails-spam.r1931824.log (Feb 12 13:21)
>    1931846 (Yes) - ham-giovanni-spam.r1931846.log (Feb 13 11:48)
>    1931824  (No) - spam-mmiroslaw-mails-ham.r1931824.log (Feb 12 13:21)
>    1931846 (Yes) - spam-grenier.r1931846.log (Feb 13 09:00)
>    1931824  (No) - ham-whyscream.r1931824.log (Feb 12 09:09)
>    1931824  (No) - spam-grenier.r1931824.log (Feb 12 09:00)
>    1931846 (Yes) - ham-jhardin.r1931846.log (Feb 13 10:53)
>    1931824  (No) - spam-whyscream.r1931824.log (Feb 12 09:09)
>    1931824  (No) - spam-giovanni-ham.r1931824.log (Feb 12 11:44)
>    1931824  (No) - spam-jhardin.r1931824.log (Feb 12 10:53)
>
> 16/18 matches (8 ham, 8 spam)
>
> WARNING: NOT ENOUGH CONTRIBUTORS, MINIMUM REQUIRED IS 10!!!
>
> Recent masscheck submission listings in the past week:
>    SVN rev (Match) File Name (Date)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-ena-week4.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:15)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-jhardin.r1931801.log (Feb 11 10:53)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-spamsponge.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:00)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-giovanni-spam.r1931801.log (Feb 11 11:43)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-ena-week1.r1931801.log (Feb 11 09:09)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-mmiroslaw-mails-ham.r1931743.log (Feb 7 13:29)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-mmiroslaw-mails-spam.r1931801.log (Feb 11 13:20)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-spamsponge.r1931801.log (Feb 11 09:00)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-giovanni-ham.r1931801.log (Feb 11 11:43)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-jhardin.r1931801.log (Feb 11 10:53)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-ena-week1.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:15)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-jhardin.r1931743.log (Feb 7 11:01)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-spamsponge.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:00)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-ena-week3.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:30)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-ena-week0.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:06)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-llanga.r1931743.log (Feb 7 17:25)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-ena-week0.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:06)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-mmiroslaw-mails-ham.r1931801.log (Feb 11 13:20)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-ena-week3.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:30)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-spamsponge.r1931801.log (Feb 11 09:00)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-whyscream.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:12)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-mmiroslaw-mails-spam.r1931801.log (Feb 11 13:20)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-mmiroslaw-mails-ham.r1931801.log (Feb 11 13:20)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-whyscream.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:12)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-llanga.r1931743.log (Feb 7 17:25)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-whyscream.r1931801.log (Feb 11 09:10)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-jhardin.r1931743.log (Feb 7 11:01)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-grenier.r1931801.log (Feb 11 09:00)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-giovanni-ham.r1931801.log (Feb 11 11:43)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-ena-week4.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:15)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-ena-week1.r1931801.log (Feb 11 09:09)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-whyscream.r1931801.log (Feb 11 09:10)
>    1931801  (No) - spam-giovanni-spam.r1931801.log (Feb 11 11:43)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-mmiroslaw-mails-ham.r1931743.log (Feb 7 13:29)
>    1931743 (Yes) - spam-net-mmiroslaw-mails-spam.r1931743.log (Feb 7 13:29)
>    1931801  (No) - ham-grenier.r1931801.log (Feb 11 09:00)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-ena-week1.r1931743.log (Feb 7 09:15)
>    1931743 (Yes) - ham-net-mmiroslaw-mails-spam.r1931743.log (Feb 7 13:29)
>
> 20/38 matches (10 ham, 10 spam)
>
> NOTE: Old are probably no longer running automasscheck script.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to