Tom,
Can you confirm the type of your bound variables? 3.1 does not
autobox primitive types anymore to make for a cleaner and more
performant code...
[]s
Edson
Michael Neale wrote:
Hi Tom - its great you are trying this out - once again - coudl you
attach enough to repoduce this to a JIRA? It will get added to the
integration tests.
There is no fundamental reason why you can't cast like that at all,
its certainly not a design constraint, just - SHOCK - a bug ! Say it
isn't so !
On 3/2/07, *Tom Gonzalez* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
We are in the process of converting from 3.0.4 to 3.1.0-M1 and
having problems building rules that have eval statements in them
that buil d in 3.0.4 with no problems.
We are getting rules build errors as follows:
[java] Feb 28, 2007 5:55:29 PM
com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackager build
[java] INFO: ============== Start build RulePackage:
[engrules.mss] =========
[java] Feb 28, 2007 5:55:29 PM
com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackage addRulesFromDrlFile
[java] INFO: adding Rules from: MG15000Rules.drl (with
associated DSL)
[java] Feb 28, 2007 5:55:29 PM
com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackage addRulesFromDrlFile
[java] INFO: parsed rules using dsl
* **[java] org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: unable to find
the function ','*
[java] at
org.drools.semantics.java.StaticMethodFunctionResolver.resolveFunction(StaticMethodFunctionResolver.java:9)
[java] at
org.drools.semantics.java.FunctionFixer.fix(FunctionFixer.java:132)
[java] at
org.drools.semantics.java.FunctionFixer.fix(FunctionFixer.java:103)
[java] at
org.drools.semantics.java.FunctionFixer.fix(FunctionFixer.java:66)
[java] at
org.drools.semantics.java.builder.EvalBuilder.build(EvalBuilder.java:78)
[java] at
org.drools.semantics.java.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.java:63)
[java] at
org.drools.semantics.java.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.java:63)
[java] at
org.drools.semantics.java.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:178)
[java] at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:381)
[java] at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:219)
[java] at
com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackage.addRulesFromDrlFile(RulePackage.java:229)
[java] at
com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackager.build(RulePackager.java:206)
[java] at
com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackager.buildAll(RulePackager.java:142)
[java] at
com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackager.main(RulePackager.java:92)
[java] Feb 28, 2007 5:55:30 PM
com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackage addRulesFromDrlFile
We have a number of rules with eval's in them such as:
eval( !(checkVspToInstanceRatio( (Integer)$vsp3ocount,
(Integer)$vsp4ecount, (Integer)$vsp3count, (Integer)$nstacount)) );
eval ( !(strInStr((String)$shelfsn,(String)$netwksn))
eval( !(checkDlepNumber( (Integer)$dlepkey, (Integer)$nstakey)) ||
!(isEvenInteger((Integer)$nstakey))
The parser has issue with the cast syntax in the eval removing the
cast (like (Integer) ) cleans up the paser issue however this is
not a feasible solution. Casting is required in some cases with
out adding a good bit of extra work.
Can you restore the support we previously had for casting with in
an eval and retain the flexibility of using casts when needed?
Thanks,
Regards,
Tom G
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3124-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9218-4151
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
