Hello...
I don't know whether it's a bug or something else... - i'm currently
evaluating the new version m2 and especially the rule-flow feature, which
would be the yet missing part for us to use drools.
So after creating a testflow.rf with your editor i've put the created
.rfm-file in the context as sugested on the blog/release-notes:
processBuilder.addProcessFromFile(new
InputStreamReader(DroolsTest.class.getResourceAsStream( "/testflow.rfm" ) )
);
After invoking the rules with workingMemory.startProcess("test"); and/or
workingMemory.fireAllRules(); nothing happened... A look in the sources and
the rfm-xml-file shows, that the element <ruleFlowGroup> is empty! I would
have expected the name of the group at this point... After changing this to
the desired string, the behaviour looks more expecting ;)
The problem is, that the .rfm file is regenerated after editing the rf-file
so changes to that will be lost...
Is it a bug or did i something wrong?
TIA
Björn
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
