Are you happy for me to continue with the work? I can plug a Factory in
to do as you describe. It depends upon your dead-line for "examples"...
 
As a side, calling WorkingMemory.startProcess(xxx) doesn't clear the
agenda so anything previously scheduled gets run along with the process.
Is this by design?
 
If so, documenting it (yep, I appreciate where everyone - "the
community" - is with that) would have prevented my head scratching last
night!
 


________________________________

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
        Sent: 18 May 2007 02:35
        To: Rules Dev List
        Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Conway example - update to use ruleflow
        
        
        No I only did agenda groups. Key part to the "port" is to share
code, so we still have examples for agenda-groups, don't want to loose
those. Probalby create a factory of some sort to abstract away the parts
in conway that do any rule stuff, so a switch can specify whether the
factory is ruleflowgroup or agenda groups.
        
        Mark
        Michael Neale wrote: 

                Hi Michael.
                
                I think Mark was working on a "stateful" conways example
(the old was stateless) - I wasn't sure if he got to using ruleflow
(just check first). 
                
                Ruleflow is probably very useful to most people who
would have used agenda-groups - agenda-groups are a stack, which is not
intuitive to most people, but ruleflows are more imperative, so examples
showing that are appreciated. I would almost go as far as to say that
*most* of the time when you want control, you want ruleflow (you will
know if you want agenda). Correct me if I am wrong, ruleflow is new to
me ! 
                
                Michael.
                
                
                On 5/16/07, Anstis, Michael (M.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: 

                        Just to let you know I am updating the example
to use ruleflow (it looks like one or more rules are wrong too as the
"glider" doesn't glide, so I'll have a look at these also). 

                        Doesn't look particularly taxing so should have
it done very soon - provided the wife doesn't complain that she's not
seeing much of me in the evenings ;-)

                        With kind regards, 

                        Mike 


                        _______________________________________________
                        rules-dev mailing list
                        [email protected]
        
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
                        
                        


                
________________________________


                _______________________________________________
                rules-dev mailing list
                [email protected]
                https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
                  


_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Reply via email to