Mark Proctor wrote: > > Ultimiately the integration should be quite lightweight - mostly about > creating rulebases and working memory and probably the scoping and > caching of these. I guess you could also have some life cycle management > about objects themselves and auto assertion/retraction to named working > memories. >
Sorry for the late entry Mark. If this the desired scope, the work I did for 2.0 is probably highly relevant. It had factory beans for creating WM and such. Is that code checked into the jboss version of the repository? -barry -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/drools-spring-and-drools-guice-tp14795239p16810831.html Sent from the drools - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
