This would be better for the user list I think - other users could provide advice - this list is for developers on the tool itself.
Thanks, Michael. On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:05 PM, premkumar<[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > We are evaluating the Drools Rule engine with Drools flow as work flow > in web based j2ee project. The following are important criteria > > 1) Customize Rules and Workflow through Web UI > 2) Admin user can see all of the items in workflow in UI (View job queue: > current queue, executed jobs, exceptions) > 3) Integrate with Calendaring/Scheduling > 4) Versioning of process definitions > 5) Ability to migrate process instances between process versions > 6) Rule Actions can be web services > 7) Web Service can be rule input > 8) Web service can be actor in process > 9) Delete/cancel process definitions at runtime > 10) Conditional elements nesting > 11) Control steps should allow parallel flows within steps for synchronizing > of joining parallel flows > 12) process simulation > > Please can any one provide your inputs on the above mentioned areas to help > us this evaluation process. > > Thanks > Prem > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Evaluation-of-Drool-Rule-Engine-with-Drools-Flow-tp25238368p25238368.html > Sent from the drools - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- Michael D Neale home: www.michaelneale.net blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
