On 09/04/2010 17:52, fxleonardo wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Thank you for your prompt response. You've mentioned that we can't get the > same richness of using Java instead of DRL. I'm a bit confused, I thought > the drl's are eventually compiled to Java code eventually. > The consequences are compiled to java, the LHS is still an interpretted network.
We plan to compiled the whole thing down to java eventually, for performance gains > I guess the reason why I was going for Java solution was because I would > like to save the conversion time from drt -> drl -> java(?). > Us compiling DRL down to java, is not the same as offering human authorable java - I believe it's the later you are after? Mark > Thanks again! > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
