On 4 August 2010 10:51, Mark Proctor <[email protected]> wrote: > > CLEAR is the result of a forced cancellation of an activation, either be > explicitely calling clear or removing a rule. > > I agree we could probably split that out and have a KB_MODIFY, so that if > the activation is cancelled as a result the rule being removed we get a > different event. > > Just wanted to point this out - removing rules is not what *we* here need to do. It probably only matters when you want to write a nit-picking event logger.
-W > Mark > > > Is this intentional? > > -W > >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
