Adrian that's awesome.. let me take a look at the free sample chapter. Greetings
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Adrian Paschke <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Amit, > > > > You might be interested in the RuleML 1.0 release which will be published > at the RuleML conference (http://2010.ruleml.org) and Business Rules Forum > in Washington DC. > > > > RuleML is not just one language but a complete language family with an > overarching extensible design including derivation rule languages and > Reaction RuleML for production rules, ECA rules and rule-based CEP. > > > > To learn more about the language design and family and how it relates to > sub languages such as W3C SWRL and RIF you can download the free sample > chapter (in the menu) from the Handbook on Emerging Rule Technologies > http://www.igi-global.com/bookstore/TitleDetails.aspx?TitleId=465. > > > > Regards, > > > > Adrian > > > ------------------------------ > > *Von:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Amit Kumar > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 11. August 2010 16:45 > *An:* Rules Dev List > *Betreff:* Re: [rules-dev] Enhancements to Rule XML (BRL) > > > > Hi Mark, > Yeah , we also wanted to use RuleML but seeing its status we decided to use > BRL and "hoped" that once RuleML is bit more evolved then Drools will > provide us some export mechanism to RuleML or we can build it. > You are in UK right? Let me setup a call with you outlining our approach > and invite some more team members from our side.. > > Regards, > Amit > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Mark Proctor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > In reality I'd like to see the BRL killed. We already have two poorly > maintained xml formats, neither keep up to date with DRL. > > BRL was initially designed as a simple xml, as we believed tooling wouldn't > want full DRL. As it turns out most people do actually just want a GUI > builder that supports full DRL. > > As a result I'd like to see an investment in a new XML format that future > proofs, for our designs for drools 6: > http://community.jboss.org/wiki/DroolsLanguageEnhancements > > I've been reluctant to start my own XML here, as i'd like to see us work > with the RuleML group in adopting their xml (probably with feedback on > needed changes) as our defualt XML for Drools. Although for the immediate > need for improving the guided editor we have no choice but to continue to > extend BRL, but those doing so should probably have it in mind that it's a > temporary solution. > > Mark > > > On 11/08/2010 03:34, Amit Kumar wrote: > > Hello folks, > > Sorry for barging in by subscribing to this developers alias > > We are a Intellectual capital Management team in Cisco Systems. We have > been using our own engines to do specific jobs for past 10 years, as part of > future growth we have decided to do away with our own custom engines and use > the drools engine to do Inference & event management rules. Good choice .. > :) > > We have evaluated the capabilities of rule authoring UIs in drools and have > faced some resistance from our Subject Matter Experts to build our own UIs > .. basically some templates which they can fill out instead of understanding > the complexities of Guvnor. Also we felt that some layer of abstraction > could be provided above guvnor UI since it does not yet provide support for > IC (Fusion based) > > Approach: > We are trying to put in some extensions to BRL to support the fusion > usecases and any other which we need. The reason we are doing it to BRL is > the same as yours .. that UI editors work with XML kind of structure instead > of a DRL file. > So eventually we would also enhance the BRL->DRL converters and provide > support in BRL to ObjectContainment (Facts containing collection of facts) > and provide testing capabilities for inference and event IC. > > Concern: > If we make any enhancements to BRL then we would want to integrate back to > community code so we can utilize any extensions to the BRL, DRL and > converters which are done by community and do not paint ourselves in a > corner. > We can share our work to provide ideas back to community and may be we can > provide some other enhancements for the community. > > Can you kindly guide us on how to make these enhancements and how do we > contribute to the code. and any standards and guidelines pages. > > Regards, > Amit > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
