yes, ? wasn't easy due to java and data munging would get messy as we map between things.

So we just left it as any valid java identifier, but using the $ prefix as a coding convention make it easier to differentiate fieldnames and bindings
Person( age : age )
Person( age == age )

The above looks a little confusing compared to:
Person( $age : age )
Person( age == $age )

Davide wants to enforce the $ prefix so that parsing can be easier.

Mark
On 24/09/2010 00:31, Michael Neale wrote:
The $name: Pattern thing I am convinced is to do with Mark's prior history of being abused by perl ;)

But the real reason is we wanted to use ?name: Pattern() - using "?" like the clips lineage of languages - but IIRC even ilog allows that. We wanted our labels to be compatible with java source code - where $variable is a valid name (although no one actually uses it) and ?name is not.

So here we are ;)


On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Greg Barton <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Yes, and I don't think we want to take readability cues from Perl. :)

    GreG

    On Sep 23, 2010, at 3:03, Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 23 September 2010 09:31, Bruno Unna <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        FWIW: in Perl, there are both operators as well (|| and
        'or'). However, they are *not* exactly the same. Although
        they can be used in any context to render a boolean
        expression, their priority makes the difference. Taken from
        official documentation (http://bit.ly/dgw4GT):


    Low precedence "and", "or", "xor" were introduced to permit "Perl
    poetry", or, more seriously, to
    permit control flow using a logical expression, especially after
    function calls without parentheses.
       see Naples or die;  # same as: see(Napes) || die(); but not:
    see(Naples || die() );

    No way this makes any sense in Drools.

    -W

        Binary "or" returns the logical disjunction of the two
        surrounding expressions. It's equivalent to || except for
        the very low precedence. This makes it useful for control flow.

        Nonetheless, it must be taken into account that the
        distinction makes sense for a Perl programmer. For a
        rules-writing guy (or girl) perhaps the distinction is
        extremely obscure.

        Regards.



    _______________________________________________
    rules-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev


    _______________________________________________
    rules-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev




--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>


_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Reply via email to