I don't think it is used or needed. Can archive it off unless anyone says otherwise.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com>wrote: > I am looking at cleaning up the build and moving to maven 3, to make it > faster, more reliable, etc. > I am also actively wondering if some modules or files aren't dead code. > First candidate is drools-atom: > > The module drools-atom is in limbo: > - It still exists > - It's not part of any build > - Does it still build? No > -- 'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing for > org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar > - Does it still compile against the latest drools version? Idunno, but > since it's not part of the build, tomorrow's refactor might break it. > - Does anyone use it? If it doesn't build and it isn't released... no? > > I don't think that code is useful to anyone in this state. I do think > it's presence alone slightly complicates the drools sources. > > > What do we do with it? > - [A] remove the directory drools-atom from trunk (it's still retired in > in subversion) > - [B] leave it like it is now. It might be usefull to someone > - [C] add it to the build again, make it work > - [D] create a separate repository "drools-incubator" and move it there > > In my opinion: > +1 for [A] > -1 for [B]: either it builds or it's not in trunk > > > If we all agree that removing dead modules is a good idea, I 'll provide > a list of possible candidates next time. > > -- > With kind regards, > Geoffrey De Smet > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- Michael D Neale home: www.michaelneale.net blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
