On 15/12/2010 09:38, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
Constraining the scope of applicable when-fragment might be added on
top of the current DSL syntax, providing a compatible migration path.
Notice that constraining the scope is similar to the rule attribute
"auto-focus", but unqualified entries may have to remain active
throughout.
Expansion will have to be able to handle insertions not only for the
last preceding pattern but also to other parenthesized condition
phrases, e.g. eval, forall, etc.
yaml looks pretty nice these days, as the underlying document storage
format.
Mark
-W
On 15 December 2010 10:18, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org
<mailto:mproc...@codehaus.org>> wrote:
Thought I'd mention where I'd like to see DSLs go in the future,
if anyone is interested. DSLs are template fragments that can be
used in conjuction with each other. I'll refer to them as template
fragments from now on.
-Selecting one template fragment constraints which peer fragments
may be used after it.
-Template fragments may have nested template fragments. The
available nested fragments are themselves constrained and
depending on which child fragment is chosen cosntrains any allowed
peer child fragments.
-As well as constraining which peer or child fragments can be used
cardinality can also be constrained.
-The peering and nesting itself can be recursively applied,
So what we are talking about here is something that is almost xsd
schema like, for producing constrained documents.
Mark
On 15/12/2010 07:41, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
On 13 December 2010 19:58, Edson Tirelli <ed.tire...@gmail.com
<mailto:ed.tire...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Mark said you would like us to take a look at some of your
commits?
Can you let me know which ones?
Hi Edson,
I have reached a state where I think changes might be committed -
see the attached README. I'll just go through the code and add
some comments and make sure no "noise" remains. Then I'll send
you the zipped tarball of all changes. If there are no
objections, I'll also commit, but I need to do this before the
git change incapacitates me. (I just don't have the time right
now for making this conversion, and I won't have it until
E12/2010. Worst time of the year for doing a change like that!)
@developers: Anybody interested in this set of changes can ask me
for the sources.
Best
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
