On 14 January 2011 14:25, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But Drools isn't being developed according to some standard Development > Life Cycle. > > Not true, but the development process should be documented more. See > /README.txt > Well... Basically, we agree ;-) > We have plenty of things already set-up. Most recently we defined they idea > focusing on "branch day" instead of "release day". > Feel free to open discussions on any other improvements we should do: > you're right there's much to do. But 1 at a time please, so people can > adjust to them. > A recent exchange with Edson/IRC has brought up a "howto" for the full branch - change - push cycle. I'm collecting... > > Next thing is the split-up of the build and repositories (if possible). > Ah, a consummation. Devoutly to be wish'd! > After that we'll look into a lieutenant git model per repository, which is > basically the coordination CM role you speak of :) > Great. -W
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
