Ge0ffrey, Did I image that you said you'd created a JIRA for the problem you found on Tomcat6?!?!
I can't find one anywhere! Cheers, Mike On 20 January 2011 16:13, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ge0ffrey, > > Packaging is now fine :-) > > I had problems running Guvnor's WAR under the Tomcat instance installed > through Synaptic on Ubuntu 10, but had no issues with a vanilla Tomcat > 6.0.30 downloaded and installed from Apache :-) > > I'll comment the JIRA but suspect issues with some Tomcat6 installation is > more a configuration related than Guvnor. > > With kind regards, > > Mike > > > On 20 January 2011 13:20, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Michael, >> >> I've done a "mvn clean install" locally and that test class >> (MockRoleBasedPermissionStore) is not packaged in the war. >> This directory >> droolsjbpm/drools-guvnor/*target* >> /drools-guvnor/WEB-INF/classes/org/drools/guvnor/server/security >> does not contain MockRoleBasedPermissionStore (which is normal, as it's >> comes from src/test/java, not src/main/java). >> >> So I don't understand how it ended up in your war you created and deployed >> to tomcat. >> Can you check if you do a "mvn clean install -DskipTests" that you have it >> again? >> >> >> I do have problems to deploy the Guvnor SNAPSHOT on tomcat 6: >> >> ERROR 20-01 14:05:09,218 (RepositoryImpl.java:getWorkspaceInfo:785) >> Unable to initialize workspace 'security' >> javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Cannot instantiate persistence manager >> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager >> at >> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.createPersistenceManager(RepositoryImpl.java:1433) >> ... >> Caused by: org.apache.commons.dbcp.SQLNestedException: Cannot create >> PoolableConnectionFactory (Failed to create database >> 'repository/workspaces/security/db', see the next exception for details.) >> at >> org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource.createDataSource(BasicDataSource.java:1225) >> ... >> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Failed to create database >> 'repository/workspaces/security/db', see the next exception for details. >> at >> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(Unknown >> Source) >> ... >> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Directory >> /home/gdesmet/opt/appserver/*apache-tomcat-6.0.30/bin/repository/workspaces/security/db >> already exists*. >> at >> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory.getSQLException(Unknown >> Source) >> ... >> Caused by: ERROR XBM0J: Directory >> /home/gdesmet/opt/appserver/apache-tomcat-6.0.30/bin/repository/workspaces/security/db >> already exists. >> at org.apache.derby.iapi.error.StandardException.newException(Unknown >> Source) >> >> >> Op 20-01-11 10:15, Geoffrey De Smet schreef: >> >> I don't know who broke it, but I 'll see if I can get it fixed >> >> Op 20-01-11 09:20, Michael Anstis schreef: >> >> Hi Ge0ffrey, >> >> >> Does it occur in hosted mode in Eclipse/IntelliJ? >> Looks like the test classes are also copied into the war?!? >> Tihomir might know more about the whole role based stuff. >> >> - It occurs when deploying to Tomcat (any Servlet Container?). >> - The WAR *does* contain all "test" classes\resources. >> - It does not occur in hosted mode (as I can remove "test" >> classes\resources from the classpath). >> - Seam is correct in reporting the error (as two classes are declared >> as being the same component, because of the inclusion of "test" classes). >> >> So I'd surmise a compile problem with maven (but it could be old news)? >> >> With kind regards, >> >> Mike >> >> On 20 January 2011 07:56, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com >> <mailto:ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com> <ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Op 19-01-11 22:33, Michael Anstis schreef: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I tried building a WAR for Guvnor and found a couple of hick-ups >> > (although it was with my local copy of master taken a few months >> ago). >> > >> > I mention them here in case they are unknown issues (feel free >> to beat >> > me up if I simply need to resync with master; which will happen as >> > part of my dtable commit...) >> > >> > 1) In \drools-guvnor >> > >> > mvn package -DskipTests=true -PfullProfile >> > >> > Didn't build dependant drools-ide-common, as I'd expect and I had to >> > "mvn install" this first. >> This is partially normal... >> mvn install = mvn package (=make the jar) + copy the jar in the local >> repository >> mvn package = mvn compile + ... + make the jar >> >> But for normal java apps, mvn compile is enough even in a >> multi-module, >> because it doesn't need to create a jar (or copy that in the local >> repo) >> as it justs reuses drools-ide-common/target/classes in the >> classpath of >> drools-guvnor. >> Just like your Eclipse/IntelliJ does (because if were to build a jar >> each time it would take as long as the maven build). >> However, that might not work for GWT compilation, >> so the safest bet it to do mvn install... >> > >> > 2) In \drools-guvnor >> > >> > mvn package -DskipTests=true -PfullProfile >> > >> > Built the WAR however the test classes are also included, >> leading to a >> > Seam error when deploying:- >> > >> > SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener >> > instance of class org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener >> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Two components with the same >> name and >> > precedence - component name: >> > org.drools.guvnor.server.security.RoleBasedPermissionStore, >> component >> > classes: >> > org.drools.guvnor.server.security.MockRoleBasedPermissionStore, >> > org.drools.guvnor.server.security.RoleBasedPermissionStore >> > at >> > >> >> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.addComponentDescriptor(Initialization.java:586) >> > at >> > >> >> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.installScannedComponentAndRoles(Initialization.java:927) >> > at >> > >> >> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.scanForComponents(Initialization.java:874) >> > at >> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.init(Initialization.java:687) >> > >> > This traced back to "MockRoleBasedPermissionStore" in the test >> classes >> > and "RoleBasedPermissionStore" in the non-test classes. >> > >> > Tomcat 6.x. >> >> Does it occur in hosted mode in Eclipse/IntelliJ? >> Looks like the test classes are also copied into the war?!? >> Tihomir might know more about the whole role based stuff. >> > >> > 3) Alot of Guvnor tests failed, however I assume Toni Rikkola could >> > have fixed recently with his work in this area. >> >> If they talk about a repository lock failing, it's cool and Toni's >> working on it. >> If it's something else, it's not cool. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Mike >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-dev mailing list >> > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> <rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> -- >> With kind regards, >> Geoffrey De Smet >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> <rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing >> listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> >> -- >> With kind regards, >> Geoffrey De Smet >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
