factconstraints (at least the GUI/GWT part) should be moved into ide-common I believe. If verifier no longer depends on ide-common, that should be possible to move.
verfier does have any GUI/GWT code (or build therefor). Op 07-02-11 13:38, Esteban Aliverti schreef: > > And what about factconstraint? It should be possible to move it to > drools-verifier? > > Best regards, > >> El feb 7, 2011 5:53 a.m., "Toni Rikkola" <toni.rikk...@gmail.com >> <mailto:toni.rikk...@gmail.com>> escribió: >> >> It should be possible to keep drools-verifier in the drools repo. >> Doing some changes to support this right now. >> >> Toni >> >> >> On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: >> >> > After the split-up drools-verifier is suppo... >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- With kind regards, Geoffrey De Smet _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
