On 9 February 2011 22:11, Edson Tirelli <ed.tire...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Pierre, > > Good to see works like yours being done. > > Drools has an internal canonical model that we use to round trip rules > between the syntaxes we support. The best way of supporting "RIF" in Drools > is to simply add a parser that parses RIF and populates the canonical model. > From that we have a DRL "dumper" that generates DRL, enabling the RIF->DRL > translation. Also, if we create a RIF "dumper", one can then generate RIF > rules from the canonical model, enabling DRL->RIF translation. That assumes > that there is a 1-to-1 semantic mapping between RIF and DRL (I believe there > is, but didn't checked). > Do you mean that all of RIF can be expressed in DRL? Then I'd agree. But you can't express all of DRL in RIF. -W > > Edson > > > 2011/2/9 <p...@agh.edu.pl> > > Mark, Andrew, Guys, >> >> Yes working with DRL may be better for Drools indeed. But the only way I >> see this working is by implementing this directly in the code of Drools. >> That's not practical for me, hence I "simply" export/import the rules >> in/from XML. This way I can focus on the translation. >> >> If someone would give me pointers on an easy way to work with DRL, I'd do >> that of course. >> >> I assume you already had discussions on XML (or anything more structured >> and widely spread than DRL) as working format so I won't be going there :) >> >> All the best, >> Pierre >> >> >> On 09/02/2011 16:46, Mark Proctor wrote: >> > On 09/02/2011 08:40, pdl at agh.edu.pl wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I've been working on translators between RIF-PRD, DroolsML and JessML. >> >> I've put the translators in the form of XSLT stylesheets on the >> following >> >> web site along with samples of rules written in the above languages. I >> >> would greatly appreciate feedback/comments/tips/help on making these >> >> translators more reliable and accurate. >> >> >> >> Web site: yieldrif (dot) appspot (dot) com (in case emails containing >> >> URLs are bounced off) >> >> >> >> Please note that this is free hosting and has some limitations. Feel >> free >> >> to add/comment content on this web site or drop me a line. What would >> be >> >> really helpful is a XML Schema for DroolsML and also the rhs to be in >> XML >> >> as opposed to drools code. >> > Is this converting to Drools DRL? or to our deprecate, unmaintained, out >> > of date and very old XML? >> Sorry someone just read that sentence back to me, and it probably read >> very wrong. >> >> Let me start again. First up great work, it's good to see any >> interchange work happening, it's not easy stuff. And I can't wait for us >> to figure out how to get this working directly against our more recent >> DRL :) >> >> Mark >> > Mark >> >> I look forward to hearing from you, >> >> Pierre >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> rules-dev mailing list >> >> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-dev mailing list >> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Edson Tirelli > JBoss Drools Core Development > JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
