Hi Michael,

Please see this:
http://blog.athico.com/2011/01/jdk15-future-for-drools-and-jbpm.html

The conclusion on IRC, IIRC, was that we're to target 1.5 until ~the end of
the year and then move to 1.6.

Cheers,

Mike

On 16 February 2011 11:00, Michael Neale <michael.ne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> why 1.5 ?
>
> ----
> twitter.com/michaelneale
> michaelneale.blogspot.com
> www.michaelneale.net
>
> On Wednesday, 16 February 2011 at 8:55 PM, Michael Anstis wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since we are destined to retain JDK1.5 compatibility for the time being and
> the likelihood that we're making new workspaces (or what not) as the GIT
> split-up progresses this is probably a good time to mention that, those of
> us running with a JDK1.6, should ensure compatibility is set to 1.5.
>
> There's been a number of classes checked into GIT (for Guvnor) following
> the split-up that had been written against a JDK1.6 with JDK1.6
> compatibility which fail to compile for those of us running either JDK1.5 or
> JDK1.6 with JDK1.5 compatibility.
>
> I'm among the guilty so this isn't a finger pointing exercise, just a
> reminder as it's too easy to forget.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Reply via email to