On 09/05/2011 17:57, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
On 9 May 2011 15:56, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org
<mailto:mproc...@codehaus.org>> wrote:
On 09/05/2011 12:40, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
But the following does not permit indexing:
<any RHS expression from above> == <fieldname>
I don't understand this question as there is no join process in
the RHS, and thus no possible indexing.
I thought that a very simple transformation could fold this back into
<fieldname> == <any RHS expression from above>
If the "indexable" forms can be detected by checking the 1st operand
and the operator, surely the same is possible for testing the 2nd
operand, followed by swapping operands.
Example:
Person( name == "Fred" )
same as
Person( "Fred" == name )
But I don't think that this is an important feature - just wanted to
make sure what is, and what is not carried over from legacy.
Sorry I got confused. When you said RHS, I thought you meant the
consequence. In theory yes it should be indexable, but not at the
moment. While we have improved the intelligence of the parser, we have
not yet done so for the indexing - so indexing is "as 5.1" for now.
Thanks
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
