Yes, I tested both.... Sadly whilst large images are scaled correctly (to fit) smaller images are expanded to fit the page width :(
So, I try to stick the attribute on large images; but ultimately I still generate the PDF and apply the "scalefit" attribute to any images that don't fit. On 11 May 2011 16:27, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Instead of having to do add that for every image, we should fix it on the > styles itself. > I created an issue for that long ago: > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDOCBOOKSTYLE-19 > If there's a patch, I can fix and release those styles (I did a release of > them last week to stop hudson crashing downloading from eclipse repo's). > > You didn't happen to test with both images that were to big and those that > were to small for a page? :) > Image to big => should be scaled down > Image to small => should NOT be scaled up to fit the page width (looks > awe-full). > That might be the tricky part :/ > > Op 11-05-11 17:04, Michael Anstis schreef: > > If you've ever struggled to get an image to scale correctly in the PDF form > of our documentation I "discovered" "scalefit" this afternoon. > > Set it to "1" on your imagedata and it'll fit perfectly in HTML and PDF :) > > <mediaobject> > <imageobject> > <imagedata fileref="whatever.png" format="PNG" scalefit="1" > > </imagedata> > </imageobject> > </mediaobject > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing > listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > -- > With kind regards, > Geoffrey De Smet > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
