On 22/06/2011 16:39, Wolfgang Laun wrote: > This is related to the example in 2.1.2.8., Backward Chaining. > > Using the same rules and queries given there, the sequence of fact insertions > > insert( new Here( "table" ) ); > insert( new Edible( "peach" ) ); > insert( new Location( "peach", "table" ) ); > > results in nothing being seen and nothing being edible, whereas > > insert( new Edible( "peach" ) ); > insert( new Location( "peach", "table" ) ); > insert( new Here( "table" ) ); > > results in the obvious and expected result. > > There is no difference w.r.t. using '?' in front of query names. Take a look at the tests here, see if you can add the logic that you think should works and doesn't and let us know. As far as I know insertion order should not matter: https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-compiler/src/test/java/org/drools/integrationtests/BackwardChainingTest.java
Mark > -W > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
