Hi, I vote for that. More release more often => Less function per release => less risk Regards Nicolas
2011/6/24 Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com> > ** > If we do more releases, the releases process will become easier and maybe > even a non-event. > At least, I believe that paradox :) > > Here's what I propose: > - For the next 4 weeks, until 22-JUL, we focus on big, risky features. > - The 2 weeks after that, until 5-AUG, we focus on bugfixing and *avoid > risky changes*. > On 5-AUG, I release 5.3.0.Beta1 directly from master. > If needed, we can call it 5.3.0.Alpha1 instead. > > This will allow our users to verify backwards compatibility and new > features sooner > and give us feed-back sooner. > > What do you think? Good idea or too ambitious? > > -- > With kind regards, > Geoffrey De Smet > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
