On 28/06/2011 14:57, Doug Palmer wrote: > If your release cycles are this short does that mean you can now sync version > numbers with jBPM? I would, but Kris has decided next time he always wants jBPM to be one version ahead of Drools - so people think it's better.
Mark > Regards > Doug > > Douglas Palmer > dpal...@redhat.com > > JBoss, by Red Hat > Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903 > Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Brendan Lane (Ireland), Matt Parson > (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) > > On 28 Jun 2011, at 11:19, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > >> Sounds good :) This is a drastic shorter release lifecycle, but I think >> it can be very good for us. >> >> So when shall we aim for the 5.3.0.Beta1? >> >> Here's my original proposed schedule, but I presume we want to shorten than? >>> - For the next 4 weeks, until 22-JUL, we focus on big, risky features. >>> - The 2 weeks after that, until 5-AUG, we focus on bugfixing and avoid >>> risky changes. >>> On 5-AUG, I release 5.3.0.Beta1 directly from master. >> Op 27-06-11 18:34, Mark Proctor schreef: >>> We will look to do a 5.3 final for early august. >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> -- >> With kind regards, >> Geoffrey De Smet >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
