On 12/08/2011 11:00, Mark Proctor wrote: > What would you call a fact that is inserted once and the conflict set > computed (the rules that can fire). The fact is then retracted so no > more matches can take place, but the conflict set itself is allowed to > fire (assuming their other facts remain true). > > I think this is quite a common use case and most users will handle this > via a lower salience and retracting the fact manually, but I think it's > useful enough to build in as a keyword on type declaration. We just need > a name for it :) > > Mark ignore on user list, was meant for dev list. sorry. > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-us...@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
