I like interjection - but not sure if it is quite right, but this is a common "pattern" of usage.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com>wrote: > One term (probably too long) would be "interjection". > > A more pictorial word is "flake", which (thinking of snowflake) provides an > inkling for the fast fade away. > > -W > > > > On 12 August 2011 12:00, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: > >> What would you call a fact that is inserted once and the conflict set >> computed (the rules that can fire). The fact is then retracted so no >> more matches can take place, but the conflict set itself is allowed to >> fire (assuming their other facts remain true). >> >> I think this is quite a common use case and most users will handle this >> via a lower salience and retracting the fact manually, but I think it's >> useful enough to build in as a keyword on type declaration. We just need >> a name for it :) >> >> Mark >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-us...@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > -- Michael D Neale home: www.michaelneale.net blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
