On 07/02/2012, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: > On 07/02/2012 08:49, Wolfgang Laun wrote: >> Developers: >> >> it would be *very nice* to have a clarifying statement as to whether >> the triplex relational expression is valid or not, so that a proper >> issue might be raised. > I discussed this with edson, he spat out his corn flakes and said it > would be a cold day in hell before he adds that request :)
My request was for *clarification*, as some people appear to think that MVEL permits that. (You know me well enough by now to guess what I think of triplex relations.) >> >> Status in 5.3.0: accepted by the DRL parser and resulting in unknown >> semantics. > We'll tighten that to correctly report an error for next 5.4 release. Hojotoho! -W _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
