I reviewed the patch, it would be nice if there was a unit test too for this - to ensure we catch any future regressions.
Mark On 23 Sep 2012, at 07:53, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: > If you have a patch for review, please submit it as a pull request at github. > Details of how to this are here: > http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html > > Mark > On 22 Sep 2012, at 12:11, Chris Rankin <ranki...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I stumbled across an issue in Drools 5.1.1 that is still present in >> Drools 5.4.0-Final, and which I raised (with a patch) as JBRULES-3630. >> This issue is a blocker for what I need to do with Drools - the >> correctness (or not) of the patch will determine whether what I am >> trying to do is viable. Can anyone comment on this, please? Is this >> really a bug in Drools, or have I completely misunderstood the >> documentation instead? >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
