Michael Anstis wrote: > Hi, > > These are the current issues.... > > *http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/drools-5.5.x/* > > Failing tests: > http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/drools-5.5.x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ > > * org.drools.integrationtests.MultithreadTest.testSlidingTimeWindows > > > *http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbpm-5.4.x/* > > Failing tests: > http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbpm-5.4.x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ > > * org.jbpm.bpmn2.SimpleBPMNProcessTest.testMultipleStartEventsStartOnTimer > > > *http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/guvnor-5.5.x/* > > Failing tests: > http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/guvnor-5.5.x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ > > * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom > (RESTEasy issue) > * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom > (RESTEasy issue) > * > BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom > (RESTEasy issue) > * > CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom > (RESTEasy issue) > Just applied RESTEasy's patch. We should see a green guvnor build soon.
Jervis > > Thanks to those concerned for fixing the failing tests from my > previous email. > > With kind regards, > > Mike > > On 16 October 2012 08:51, Toni Rikkola <t...@rikkola.net > <mailto:t...@rikkola.net>> wrote: > > This test keeps passing for me locally. I'm using the 5.5.x branch. > > PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType (Rikkola, > is this as a result of the change I think you were making around > Functions you were doing for Mario?) > > Toni > > On Oct 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Michael Anstis wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I will make the 5.5.x branch today. >> >> These are the current issues.... >> * >> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/* >> >> Failing tests: >> >> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ >> >> * SpringDroolsTest.testConfiguration >> >> >> *http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/* >> >> Failing tests: >> >> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ >> >> * >> ServiceImplementationIntegrationTest.testListUserPermissionsPagedResults >> (jliu, could you please take a look?) >> * PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType >> (Rikkola, is this as a result of the change I think you >> were making around Functions you were doing for Mario?) >> * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom >> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) >> * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom >> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) >> * >> BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom >> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) >> * >> CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom >> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) >> >> >> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/ >> >> Failing tests: >> >> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ >> >> * BPMN2OsgiTest.testMinimalProcess >> * SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiPlatformStarts >> * SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiEnvironment >> * SimpleOsgiTest.testCompiler >> * SimpleOsgiTest.testDecisionTable >> >> Who is going to volunteer to look into the Spring and OSGi >> failing tests? ;) >> >> For those who may not already be aware, due to a RESTEasy issue >> (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-782) the Atom REST API >> in Guvnor only works with AS7.0.1. >> >> Any pressure that can be applied to get the RESTEasy team to fix >> this would be welcome as it is required for jBPM Designer to work >> with Guvnor on AS7.1.x. >> >> With kind regards, >> >> Mike >> >> On 13 October 2012 17:12, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org >> <mailto:mproc...@codehaus.org>> wrote: >> >> We should try and wrap up CR1 this week. This release will >> never be productised, so quicker we can switch to 6.0 the >> better. We have a month to produce a stable "runtime" core, >> 6.0-alpha1, where we promise binary compatibility to other >> groups in SOA. >> >> I'll send an email explaining 6.0-alpha1 for monday. >> >> Mark >> >> > > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
