supporting ruleml is definitely a nice goal. They've started on some drools support, although not sure how far it's gone - we'd like to help, just haven't had the time.
We also need to find out where the gaps, overlaps and mismatches are in reaction ruleml and drl. Sounds like a good project for someone in the Drools community :) mark On 19 Mar 2013, at 20:53, kurrent93 <kurren...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mark and others > > I'm wondering, would this be a suitable replacement for drools xml - > http://ruleml.org/reaction/ > > It appears to have support for temporal elements. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-XML-Language-and-Tools-Development-tp3649047p4022900.html > Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list archive > at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
